
In a quiet contemplative moment, I asked my Muse to help me on this issue
of Musea.
"It's about the NEW CITY," I said. "I need inspiration on what the NEW CITY will look like and how art can be integrated into every nook and cranny; not only obvious corners like city planning, architecture, parks, museums, town squares, etc. , but the less obvious art of a city that functions so well for ALL its citizens, in an almost sublime way, that it itself becomes a work
of art like a bee hive or an ant mound."
My Muse told me, "You're talking to the wrong source. You need the Goddess of cities - Pallas Athene.
I'll start this singing with
that grand goddess,
Pallas Athena
bright eyes,
so shrewd,
her heart inexorable,
as virgin, redoubtable,
protectress of cities,... (Homer, trans C. Boer)
So ... before Pallas Athene I repeated my dilemma: (note: Art S Rev. was born with his sun 22' Virgo, conjunct the asteroid Pallas Athena at 18' Virgo.)
"This DALLAS, is it worthy?" she asked.
I was stymied at first how to respond, then said.
"Worthy of experimentation, worthy of a possible future that could someday include art city of the world. That's what I believe."
She paused, thought, paced and said, "Then let's experiment! Ideas, ideas, ideas," she said to herself. "Write as I talk," she said to me.
"A new city- to prosper must have new ideas.. here's a town square full:
You will face the millennium on the back of a horse, Pegasus. That has been and always will be the symbol of Dallas. The flying horse will take you safely into the future. You will become the largest LAND CITY, city not on the coast of an ocean, sea, or great river. That is what we're left with. That is what we'll work with.
Now let's start on the basics, begin at the beginning. (Books materialize out of heady air and she reads these quotes):
The books on her lap, piled all around her and in her hand vanished. She looked at me and said, "Take what you've learned, and tell me what you've learned. Begin with the overall picture of your New City."
I hesitated.
"Here I will help you SEE. I will project your thoughts on this temple wall as if you were watching a Greek play. (A pass of her hand and the wall came alive with the pictures that were in my head - pictures of the new city)
"Now I see."
"See what?" she laughed.
"I see that the city has limits. The townspeople have chosen borders-perimeters of what they will call their city. Now instead of spreading out they will build and perfect within."
"I see that the New City has the 3 things that every one wants: safety to be who you want to be and to do what you want to do when you want to; beauty - a joy of life on every street; and finally a spirituality that replaces the former emptiness. There's now a sum greater than the individual, yet made up of all kinds: rich & poor, young & old, wise & learning."
"Now for the specifics, details, look closer," she said.
"I see that it's clean in many ways. Noise pollution is low, the buildings are well designed and cared for with a variety of styles of architecture that somehow all commingle well. And there's something missing.. Oh Yes, signs, commercials, billboards, ads on buses,...And no litter! (Reducing packaging reduces litter. Instead of recycling, don't waste in the first place.) And -
amazingly - I see people actually picking UP litter."
"Why?"
"I feel it's because they actually LOVE this city. It's not a law or command, they simply WANT their streets clean and are taking the responsibility on their own shoulders. To them it's an extension of their own homes and their own beings."
"More details."
"The city works FOR the people. The government is supportive, not adversarial.
"In what ways?"
"Free rail anywhere it goes. Free neighborhood buses. Free rides to and from the airport to SUPPORT visitors. Free parking downtown to ENCOURAGE visitors, plus they have built a bullet train triangle that connects Dallas/Fort Worth with Houston and the coast, and then San Antonio/Austin, and then back home."
"More details."
"The city seems to be divided into 2 types. Clumps of no-car zones and surrounding areas much like today with multi streets. The triangle of land from Downtown to Fair Park to Rochester Park and back to Downtown along the Trinity is the largest no-car zone."
"Oh Goddess, over there I see the greatest concentration of people all together. It's the town square, (the place to promenade), the public realm. And I instinctively sense that it's NOT owned by big business, not controlled by the government, and public assembly is not only not denied, it's encouraged. Everyone wants to be there - the heart of the city."
"And in its center are the fountains..."
"And speaking of water..."
"Yes water is vital to this city."
"I see you see that clean water will be the key to your civilization. I can tell you that someone or ones will offer a world prize for the first person to discover a simple and inexpensive way to take the salt out of water and end the world drought."
"Cities will fall to rebellion or rise to peace all over water - and if or when the water can be pumped to cities from the seas (like oil is now) life will prosper as never before."
"That's enough for now my young visionary. Sleep."
I fell into a heavy sweet swoon and slept.
The next day the Goddess was gone, but like the smell of incense, (though burned to ash) that still hovers in the air, her inspiration remained.
Instead of building cities for cars we should be building cities for people. - Art S. Rev.
RULE #1 Highways destroy neighborhoods. Take an axe to a person and cleave him in half he dies. Build a highway through a neighborhood and it dies. Proof? Look at the cemetery that surrounds Downtown Dallas, On virtually every side that's near a highway that neighborhood is a slum or extremely run down at best. -Art S. Rev.
These days few dispute the argument that high-speed limited-access highways carved through the middle of cities have been pointlessly destructive. (Public Official Of The Year, John O. Norquist, Mayor of Milwaukee) would actually like to see some of them torn down, and he insists the feds need to make it easier for like-minded cities to do so... In Milwaukee, plans to replace a local freeway with a boulevard are on the drawing board, and the city is exploring the
idea of demolishing a nearby interstate highway." - Charles Mahtesian.
I propose that we now identify the human ecology of America precisely for what it really has become: the national automobile slum. - Kunstler.
I have to schedule my entire day around the traffic. It takes me five minutes to go a couple of blocks. Kristin Jones on Atlanta Traffic. (AP)
Americans are battling a new, even more maddening rush hour-in the middle of the day. Headline from USA Today 11/23/98.
And how do we deal with the car problem. Short term solutions may include: tax breaks for any company that can get one half of its workforce to work by foot, or mass transit; and outlaw construction on busy hours of the day and on any days of the year that have extra traffic (holidays, peak shopping days etc.) Also restrict when and where big hauling rigs can go (they seem to be causing more and more of the worst traffic accidents and jams). And what about rail? That does NOT seem to be the answer. John Stossel of 20/20 did an investigation of the LA rail system in progress and found that it's costing the city $50,000 per foot and hardly anyone will ride it when its finished because all the rails lead downtown. People don't want to go downtown (excluding lawyers and gov officials). They want to do errands in their neighborhood, take their kids to school, visit restaurants and shop. So what's the solution? We say take the 1,000's of dollars per foot in rail and invest in clean neighborhood buses that circle neighborhoods, and neighborhood taxis (maybe even free) that take you anywhere in your local neighborhood. And what about a free, city wide emergency road service provided by the government?
And maybe somewhere in the future, community cars and vans that ANYONE living in that community can use on a reserve-it basis, and the city maintains the vehicles. That would take all the endless red tape out of using a car. Also there needs to be no-car zones, where people can relax again. Walk in safety. Maybe there will be rickshaws, maybe horse carriages (animals seem to have an incredible ability to sooth nervous people and brighten everyone's day)
Also since the cars are gone, the children can play in peace, musicians can stroll, vendors can set up stands, etc., which all leads to a sense of COMMUNITY. (Also thieves have to escape on foot or bike and are more likely to be caught)

AND FINALLY, In Russia under communism, relgion was banned. In America, it's different, right? Yet our government bans all religion on the principle of separation of church and state and big business bans religion in the workplace and all of its advertising so as not to offend anyone and the mainstream media bans religion in its news coverage to be "fair." What we're left with is a shrinking realm of places where religion is not banned. But a country that believes in nothing and is empty and dying. The religion of "Buy and Sell" may fill your home but it won't fill your heart and soul.
I suggest that the government, business and media, instead of banning all religion, should promote all religion. Let's integrate our religious beliefs (and religious tolerance) back into our world.
By Alden Scott Crow
Who would’ve thought a porch would be such a big deal?
You might remember porches. They’re the things that used to be attached to the fronts of homes. People would sit and talk for a spell there. That is, before Henry Ford came along with his automobile (and its new home, the garage).
There is a group of architects and planners who remember porches. They want to bring them back. They also want to encourage pedestrians and cyclists in communities. They hate sprawl and instead push houses closer together.
Such radical ideas bring plentiful heapings of praise and vilification to these architects and planners, commonly called New Urbanists. As the debate over their projects rages, New Urbanist architects and designers are making a quiet impact on cities and suburbs today.
There is no New Urbanist School or hard-and-fast New Urbanist Doctrine. But there are a few key principles most all New Urbanists adhere to: communities should be "integrated," with homes, shops, schools, parks, and other facilities within easy walking distance of each other; communities should have a diversity of housing styles and types (as well as a range of income and age groups); pedestrian and bicycle activity should be encouraged; and green open space (parks, etc.) should be used to stop urban sprawl. These beliefs run directly counter to the subdivision mania of modern-day America, where families flee the city to tract-home suburbs. The New Urbanists are a response to the clogged freeways and uncontrolled growth of this short-sighted policy.
Starting in the 1980s, New Urbanist planners started new communities like Seaside in Florida, Kentlands outside Washington, D.C., and Laguna West near Sacramento, CA. The projects were called "traditional towns," with classical architecture, walking-friendly neighborhoods, and tight-knit housing. Several years later, the projects are going well. And new projects are under way, and not just in the suburbs.
Inner cities in the U.S. are starting to embrace New Urbanist ideals. Providence, R.I., Cleveland, and Los Angeles are all considering projects utilizing New Urbanist specs. Towns north of the U.S. border in Canada are also catching the New Urbanist wave. Several New Urbanist-inspired villages have been completed near Toronto and Calgary. Early response to the villages has been positive, spurring plans for more new "traditional towns."
Both America and Canada saw similar patterns of development over the past two decades. People crowded into the suburbs. Those new suburbs consisted of wide streets (better for commuters and all their cars), 2-car garages (again, for the mighty auto), large side and back yards, communities made up of mostly the same kind of housing styles (tract homes) and people (witness some subdivisions with only young families), and considerable distances from shops and work. This all led to more freeways and traffic, a sameness in community architecture, and a sense that neighbors didn’t know or care about each other any more.
New Urbanists counter the sprawl in simple ways. Consider the humble porch, for example. Since the garage took the place of this residential feature, New Urbanists believe returning the porch as part of a home will de-emphasize the automobile’s role and encourage more family and community interaction.
Another uncomplicated New Urbanist idea is the old town square, where residents of a community can pick up their mail, go to a true corner store, and chat with neighbors along the way (they’re walking, after all) and at the square.
Critics counter that New Urbanists are sentimentalists who are merely designing "cuter sprawl." These same critics also make the -- perhaps sadly correct -- point that most people are yet unwilling to sacrifice their suburban dreams for a kindler, gentler community. New Urbanist critics argue people are not ready to give up their big backyards and space from the noisy neighbors.
And New Urbanist designers acknowledge some of the criticisms. They are working to fine-tune their designs to better meet community needs. They are working on plans for inner cities that adapt to the individual situations.
But the bottom line is the New Urbanist planners are not Utopians; they simply feel that a community is better if people walk instead of drive, if people are neighbors instead of strangers, and if communities come together instead of sprawling apart.
Will New Urbanism last, or are people too in love with their two-car garages and big lawns? Only time will tell.
For more reading on this subject, go to your library and check out Maclean’s magazine, July 21, 1997, p. 16-21, Architectural Record magazine, January 1997, p. 132-145, or do a "New Urbanist" subject search and see what you find.